DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Peugeot 301 vs 2000 Tofas Dogan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Peugeot 301

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 9 points.

56.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeTofas
301ModelDogan
2014Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

12,4 s0–100 km/h13,2 s
180 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1581 cc
92 HPPower83 HP
230 NmTorque125 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
4,9 ltUrban consumption—
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4442 mmLength4316 mm
1748 mmWidth1642 mm
1466 mmHeight1437 mm
1090 KgWeight1040 Kg
2652 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Peugeot 301 and 2000 Tofas Dogan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Peugeot 301 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 9 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…