DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Peugeot 301 vs 2015 Fiat Egea Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Egea

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeFiat
301ModelEgea
2012Model year2015
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,4 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
180 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
92 HPPower95 HP
230 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
4,9 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
4,1 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—TransmissionManual
—Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4442 mmLength4532 mm
1748 mmWidth1792 mm
1466 mmHeight1497 mm
1090 KgWeight1150 kg
—Luggage capacity520 lt
2652 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Peugeot 301

No additional feature records are available.

Fiat EgeaDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Peugeot 301 and 2015 Fiat Egea approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Egea leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…