E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Audi RS 3 vs 2019 BMW X3 M Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
RESULT

Tie

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score.

98.5–98.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi RS 3SpecificationBMW X3 M
AudiMakeBMW
RS 3ModelX3 M
2017Model year2019
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Audi RS 3SpecificationBMW X3 M
4,1 s0–100 km/h4,1 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2480 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
400 HPPower510 HP
480 NmTorque600 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Audi RS 3SpecificationBMW X3 M
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption12,8 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,8 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption10,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi RS 3SpecificationBMW X3 M
4x4Drivetrain4x4
7 S tronicGears8 Steptronic
235/35 R19 91Y; 255/30 R19 91YTyre size255/40 R21 102Y; 265/40 R21 105Y
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi RS 3SpecificationBMW X3 M
4479 mmLength4726 mm
1802 mmWidth1897 mm
1397 mmHeight1669 mm
1515 KgWeight1970 Kg
2631 mmWheelbase2864 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Audi RS 3 and 2019 BMW X3 M approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score. The better choice therefore depends more heavily on priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance and equipment.

Comments are loading…