DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Peugeot 208 vs 2017 Ford Figo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Figo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.25–57.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeFord
208ModelFigo
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h—
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1199 ccEngine displacement1196 cc
82 HPPower88 HP
118 NmTorque112 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank42 lt
5,5 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3962 mmLength3995 mm
1829 mmWidth1695 mm
1460 mmHeight1525 mm
975 kgWeight—
285 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2491 mm

Additional Features

Peugeot 208Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerPower Front WindowsCooled GloveboxManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy Wheels
Ford Figo

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Peugeot 208 and 2017 Ford Figo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Figo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…