DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Peugeot 208 vs 2016 Tata Nano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tata Nano

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.25–57.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeTata
208ModelNano
2015Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors5

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed105 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement624 cc
68 HPPower38 HP
95 NmTorque51 Nm
3Cylinders2

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank24 lt
5,1 ltUrban consumption—
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
ManualTransmission—
15Tyre size135/70 R12; 155/65 R12
YesABS—

Dimensions

3962 mmLength3164 mm
1829 mmWidth1750 mm
1460 mmHeight1652 mm
975 kgWeight695-735 Kg
285 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2230 mm

Additional Features

Peugeot 208Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelCooled GloveboxManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorRear Parking Sensors
Tata Nano

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Peugeot 208 and 2016 Tata Nano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tata Nano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…