DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Peugeot 207 vs 2013 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Peugeot 207SpecificationMazda 3
PeugeotMakeMazda
207Model3
2013Model year2013
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Peugeot 207SpecificationMazda 3
12,3 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
182 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1496 cc
92 HPPower100 HP
230 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Peugeot 207SpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank51 lt
5,5 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Peugeot 207SpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/55 R16Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Peugeot 207SpecificationMazda 3
4164 mmLength4460 mm
1748 mmWidth1795 mm
1527 mmHeight1450 mm
1247 KgWeight1190 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Peugeot 207 and 2013 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…