DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Peugeot 206 vs 2003 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Peugeot 206SpecificationMG ZR
PeugeotMakeMG
206ModelZR
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

Peugeot 206SpecificationMG ZR
8,9 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
210 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
135 HPPower113 HP
190 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Peugeot 206SpecificationMG ZR
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Peugeot 206SpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15VTyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Peugeot 206SpecificationMG ZR
3835 mmLength4011 mm
1673 mmWidth1690 mm
1430 mmHeight1400 mm
1050 KgWeight1155 Kg
2442 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Peugeot 206 and 2003 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…