DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Peugeot 206 vs 2000 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeVolvo
206ModelV40
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
198 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement1587 cc
109 HPPower109 HP
147 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption11,1 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3835 mmLength4516 mm
1652 mmWidth1716 mm
1426 mmHeight1425 mm
1088 KgWeight1280 Kg
2442 mmWheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Peugeot 206 and 2000 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…