2010 • Peugeot
206
Peugeot 206 1.6 (110 Hp) 2010Overall Score59.5/100
2010 Peugeot 206 vs 2010 Mazda 3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 1.6 CD (109 Hp) 2010Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Peugeot 206SpecificationMazda 3
PeugeotMakeMazda
206Model3
2010Model year2010
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Peugeot 206SpecificationMazda 3
—0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
110 HPPower109 HP
147 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Peugeot 206SpecificationMazda 3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption5,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,8 lt
—Average consumption4,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Peugeot 206SpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Peugeot 206SpecificationMazda 3
4188 mmLength4460 mm
1655 mmWidth1755 mm
1452 mmHeight1470 mm
—Weight1260 Kg
2442 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Peugeot 206 and 2010 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…