DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Peugeot 206 vs 2003 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Peugeot 206SpecificationRover 25
PeugeotMakeRover
206Model25
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

Peugeot 206SpecificationRover 25
14,7 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
168 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1398 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
68 HPPower103 HP
150 NmTorque123 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Peugeot 206SpecificationRover 25
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,5 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Peugeot 206SpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R13Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Peugeot 206SpecificationRover 25
3835 mmLength3990 mm
1652 mmWidth1688 mm
1428 mmHeight1417 mm
975 KgWeight1105 Kg
2442 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Peugeot 206 and 2003 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…