DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Peugeot 206 vs 2000 Perodua Kenari Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kenari

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakePerodua
206ModelKenari
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

15,2 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
158 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1124 ccEngine displacement989 cc
60 HPPower56 HP
91 NmTorque88 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank40 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70R13Tyre size155/65 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3835 mmLength3460 mm
1652 mmWidth1475 mm
1426 mmHeight1665 mm
910 KgWeight845 Kg
2442 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Peugeot 206 and 2000 Perodua Kenari approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kenari leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…