DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Peugeot 2008 vs 2010 Brilliance M1 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Brilliance M1

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

45–46
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeBrilliance
2008ModelM1
2013Model year2010
CrossoverBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

14,9 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
159 km/hTop speed195 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
68 HPPower136 HP
275 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank74 lt
4,6 ltUrban consumption—
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4159 mmLength4880 mm
1739 mmWidth1800 mm
1556 mmHeight1450 mm
1090 KgWeight1420 Kg
2537 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Peugeot 2008 and 2010 Brilliance M1 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Brilliance M1 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…