DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Peugeot 106 vs 1996 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Peugeot 106

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeRenault
106ModelMegane
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
195 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
104 HPPower98 HP
135 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption6,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/60 R14Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3564 mmLength4440 mm
1607 mmWidth1699 mm
1360 mmHeight1420 mm
870 KgWeight1135 Kg
2385 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Peugeot 106 and 1996 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Peugeot 106 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…