DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Peugeot 106 vs 1996 Rover Mini MK Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeRover
106ModelMini MK
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3

Performance

19,2 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
150 km/hTop speed140 km/h
954 ccEngine displacement1274 cc
45 HPPower50 HP
73 NmTorque89 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank34 lt
—Urban consumption7,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
145/70 R13Tyre size145/70 R12
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3564 mmLength3050 mm
1590 mmWidth1410 mm
1369 mmHeight1350 mm
760 KgWeight645 Kg
2385 mmWheelbase2035 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Peugeot 106 and 1996 Rover Mini MK approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…