DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Peugeot 1007 vs 2009 Volkswagen Fox Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Fox

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeVolkswagen
1007ModelFox
2009Model year2009
MinivanBody typeHatchback
4Seats4
3Doors3

Performance

16,7 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
160 km/hTop speed167 km/h
1398 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
70 HPPower75 HP
160 NmTorque124 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size165/70 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3731 mmLength3828 mm
1826 mmWidth1660 mm
1620 mmHeight1544 mm
1168 KgWeight1012 Kg
2315 mmWheelbase2465 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Peugeot 1007 and 2009 Volkswagen Fox approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Fox leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…