DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Perodua Nippa vs 2001 Smart Crossblade Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Crossblade

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

38.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeroduaMakeSmart
NippaModelCrossblade
1999Model year2001
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

16,0 s0–100 km/h16,8 s
135 km/hTop speed135 km/h
847 ccEngine displacement599 cc
58 HPPower70 HP
63 NmTorque100 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
32 ltFuel tank22 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
145/70 R12Tyre size195/40 R16; 215/35 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3395 mmLength2500 mm
1395 mmWidth1515 mm
1410 mmHeight1549 mm
650 KgWeight730 Kg
2280 mmWheelbase1812 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Perodua Nippa and 2001 Smart Crossblade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Crossblade leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…