DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Perodua Kenari vs 2008 Hyundai Atos Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kenari

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeroduaMakeHyundai
KenariModelAtos
2008Model year2008
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,0 s0–100 km/h15,4 s
140 km/hTop speed152 km/h
989 ccEngine displacement1086 cc
56 HPPower59 HP
88 NmTorque83 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank35 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13Tyre size155/80 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3460 mmLength3495 mm
1475 mmWidth1495 mm
1665 mmHeight1615 mm
845 KgWeight—
2600 mmWheelbase2380 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Perodua Kenari and 2008 Hyundai Atos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kenari leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…