DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Perodua Kenari vs 2004 Mazda 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kenari

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeroduaMakeMazda
KenariModel2
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,0 s0–100 km/h15,1 s
140 km/hTop speed163 km/h
989 ccEngine displacement1242 cc
56 HPPower75 HP
88 NmTorque110 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3460 mmLength3925 mm
1475 mmWidth1680 mm
1665 mmHeight1545 mm
845 KgWeight1050 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Perodua Kenari and 2004 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kenari leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…