DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Perodua Kenari vs 2005 Daewoo Matiz Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kenari

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

43.5–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeroduaMakeDaewoo
KenariModelMatiz
2004Model year2005
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors5

Performance

15,0 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
140 km/hTop speed144 km/h
989 ccEngine displacement796 cc
56 HPPower52 HP
88 NmTorque69 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank38 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13Tyre size145/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3460 mmLength3495 mm
1475 mmWidth1495 mm
1665 mmHeight1485 mm
845 KgWeight806 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2340 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Perodua Kenari and 2005 Daewoo Matiz approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kenari leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…