DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Perodua Kenari vs 2003 Volkswagen Lupo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kenari

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeroduaMakeVolkswagen
KenariModelLupo
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

15,0 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
140 km/hTop speed152 km/h
989 ccEngine displacement999 cc
56 HPPower50 HP
88 NmTorque86 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank34 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13Tyre size155/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3460 mmLength3527 mm
1475 mmWidth1640 mm
1665 mmHeight1460 mm
845 KgWeight884 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2323 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Perodua Kenari and 2003 Volkswagen Lupo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kenari leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…