DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Perodua Kenari vs 2003 Skoda Fabia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kenari

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeroduaMakeSkoda
KenariModelFabia
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,0 s0–100 km/h16,3 s
140 km/hTop speed162 km/h
989 ccEngine displacement1198 cc
56 HPPower64 HP
88 NmTorque112 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13Tyre size165/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

3460 mmLength4222 mm
1475 mmWidth1646 mm
1665 mmHeight1452 mm
845 KgWeight1095 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2462 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Perodua Kenari and 2003 Skoda Fabia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kenari leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…