DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Perodua Kenari vs 2002 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kenari

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeroduaMakeCitroen
KenariModelC3
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,0 s0–100 km/h17,3 s
140 km/hTop speed157 km/h
989 ccEngine displacement1124 cc
56 HPPower60 HP
88 NmTorque94 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13Tyre size165/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3460 mmLength3850 mm
1475 mmWidth1667 mm
1665 mmHeight1529 mm
845 KgWeight978 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Perodua Kenari and 2002 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kenari leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…