DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Perodua Kelisa vs 2004 Tofas Albea Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kelisa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeroduaMakeTofas
KelisaModelAlbea
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

14,8 s0–100 km/h16,9 s
140 km/hTop speed150 km/h
989 ccEngine displacement1242 cc
56 HPPower60 HP
88 NmTorque102 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank48 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,0 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R12Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3480 mmLength4186 mm
1490 mmWidth1703 mm
1425 mmHeight1490 mm
775 KgWeight1015 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2439 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Perodua Kelisa and 2004 Tofas Albea approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kelisa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…