DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Perodua Kelisa vs 2003 Chevrolet Celta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kelisa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeroduaMakeChevrolet
KelisaModelCelta
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

14,8 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
140 km/hTop speed151 km/h
989 ccEngine displacement999 cc
56 HPPower60 HP
88 NmTorque81 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank46 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R12Tyre size145/80 R13T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3480 mmLength3748 mm
1490 mmWidth1608 mm
1425 mmHeight1429 mm
775 KgWeight834 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2443 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Perodua Kelisa and 2003 Chevrolet Celta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kelisa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…