DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Perodua Kelisa vs 2002 ZAZ Sens Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kelisa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeroduaMakeZAZ
KelisaModelSens
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,8 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
140 km/hTop speed162 km/h
989 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
56 HPPower70 HP
88 NmTorque108 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank48 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R12Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

3480 mmLength4074 mm
1490 mmWidth1678 mm
1425 mmHeight1432 mm
775 KgWeight1182 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Perodua Kelisa and 2002 ZAZ Sens approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kelisa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…