DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Perodua Bezza vs 2017 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Bezza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeroduaMakeRenault
BezzaModelClio
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h14,5 s
0 km/hTop speed167 km/h
998 ccEngine displacement1149 cc
68 HPPower75 HP
91 NmTorque107 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
36 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption7,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,7 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—TransmissionManual
175/65 R14Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4150 mmLength4062 mm
1620 mmWidth1777 mm
1510 mmHeight1448 mm
865 KgWeight980 kg
—Luggage capacity300 lt
2455 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Renault ClioDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerKeyless StartArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Perodua Bezza and 2017 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Bezza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…