DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Alfa Romeo 147 vs 2004 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeKia
147ModelOptima
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h—
208 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1970 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower149 HP
181 NmTorque193 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
12,1 ltUrban consumption—
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4223 mmLength4745 mm
1729 mmWidth1815 mm
1442 mmHeight1420 mm
1275 KgWeight1405 Kg
2546 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Alfa Romeo 147 and 2004 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…