DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Audi Q7 vs 2004 Jaguar XJR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

86.75–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi Q7SpecificationJaguar XJR
AudiMakeJaguar
Q7ModelXJR
2005Model year2004
SUVBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Audi Q7SpecificationJaguar XJR
7,4 s0–100 km/h5,3 s
244 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4163 ccEngine displacement4196 cc
350 HPPower395 HP
440 NmTorque541 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Audi Q7SpecificationJaguar XJR
PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank85 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption17,9 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
—Average consumption12,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi Q7SpecificationJaguar XJR
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6 TiptronicGears6
255/55 R18Tyre size255/40 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi Q7SpecificationJaguar XJR
5086 mmLength5024 mm
1983 mmWidth1799 mm
1737 mmHeight1314 mm
2240 KgWeight1728 Kg
3002 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Audi Q7 and 2004 Jaguar XJR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…