DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Audi Q7 vs 2004 Jaguar S-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar S-type

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

86.75–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeJaguar
Q7ModelS-type
2005Model year2004
SUVBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

7,4 s0–100 km/h5,6 s
244 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4163 ccEngine displacement4196 cc
350 HPPower395 HP
440 NmTorque541 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank68 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption18,5 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,6 lt
—Average consumption12,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6 TiptronicGears6
255/55 R18Tyre size245/40 R18; 275/35 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5086 mmLength4861 mm
1983 mmWidth1819 mm
1737 mmHeight1441 mm
2240 KgWeight1800 Kg
3002 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Audi Q7 and 2004 Jaguar S-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar S-type leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…