DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Opel Zafira vs 2016 Mazda CX-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeMazda
ZafiraModelCX-3
2016Model year2016
MPVBody typeSUV
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
195 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1956 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
130 HPPower120 HP
300 NmTorque204 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank48 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4656 mmLength4275 mm
1928 mmWidth1765 mm
1685 mmHeight1535 mm
—Weight1155 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Opel Zafira and 2016 Mazda CX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…