DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Opel Vectra vs 2002 Honda Sm-x Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Vectra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeHonda
VectraModelSm-x
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
4Doors4

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
122 HPPower131 HP
167 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption8,93 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,43 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4596 mmLength3950 mm
1798 mmWidth1695 mm
1460 mmHeight1750 mm
1395 KgWeight1330 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Opel Vectra and 2002 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Vectra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…