DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Opel Vectra vs 1997 Toyota Funcargo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Funcargo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

45.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeToyota
VectraModelFuncargo
1996Model year1997
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
175 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
82 HPPower86 HP
168 NmTorque124 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4495 mmLength3890 mm
1707 mmWidth1690 mm
1425 mmHeight1680 mm
1260 KgWeight1055 Kg
2637 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Opel Vectra and 1997 Toyota Funcargo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Funcargo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…