DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Opel Vectra vs 1996 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

45.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeMazda
VectraModel323
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
175 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1489 cc
82 HPPower88 HP
168 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption9 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size175/70 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

4495 mmLength4245 mm
1707 mmWidth1695 mm
1425 mmHeight1355 mm
1260 KgWeight1115 Kg
2637 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Opel Vectra and 1996 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…