DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Opel Tigra vs 2001 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Tigra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeChevrolet
TigraModelTracker
2001Model year2001
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
2+2Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h—
203 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
106 HPPower97 HP
148 NmTorque133 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank56 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption14 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size195/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3922 mmLength3650 mm
1600 mmWidth1630 mm
1340 mmHeight1650 mm
1086 KgWeight1235 Kg
2429 mmWheelbase2200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Opel Tigra and 2001 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Tigra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…