1997 • Opel
Tigra
Opel Tigra 1.4 16V (90 Hp) 1997Overall Score46.25/100
1997 Opel Tigra vs 1997 Opel Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.0i 16V (136 Hp) 1997Overall Score55.5/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 9.25 points.
46.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel TigraSpecificationOpel Omega
OpelMakeOpel
TigraModelOmega
1997Model year1997
CoupeBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Opel TigraSpecificationOpel Omega
11,0 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
190 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1389 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower136 HP
125 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel TigraSpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank75 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption12,7 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel TigraSpecificationOpel Omega
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel TigraSpecificationOpel Omega
3922 mmLength4785 mm
1604 mmWidth1785 mm
1340 mmHeight1450 mm
980 KgWeight1551 Kg
2429 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Opel Tigra and 1997 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 9.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…