DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Opel Sintra vs 1996 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeFord
SintraModelTaurus
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeEstate
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h—
201 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2962 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
201 HPPower147 HP
260 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank61 lt
15,6 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 HR 15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4670 mmLength5070 mm
1830 mmWidth1854 mm
1780 mmHeight1463 mm
1725 KgWeight1579 Kg
2865 mmWheelbase2756 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Opel Sintra and 1996 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…