DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Opel Omega vs 1999 Chevrolet Camaro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

82.5–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeChevrolet
OmegaModelCamaro
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors3

Performance

7,0 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
250 km/hTop speed254 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
310 HPPower310 HP
450 NmTorque472 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank59 lt
18 ltUrban consumption18,9 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
14 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
235/45 R17Tyre size245/50 ZR16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4898 mmLength4910 mm
1775 mmWidth1880 mm
1450 mmHeight1300 mm
1650 KgWeight1570 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Opel Omega and 1999 Chevrolet Camaro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…