2000 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 5.7i V8 (310 Hp) 2000Overall Score82.5/100
2000 Opel Omega vs 1995 BMW M3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • BMW
M3
BMW M3 3.2 (321 Hp) 1995Overall Score83.5/100
WINNER
BMW M3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
82.5–83.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationBMW M3
OpelMakeBMW
OmegaModelM3
2000Model year1995
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationBMW M3
7,0 s0–100 km/h5,6 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement3201 cc
310 HPPower321 HP
450 NmTorque350 Nm
8Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationBMW M3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank62 lt
18 ltUrban consumption17,0 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
14 ltAverage consumption11,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationBMW M3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
235/45 R17Tyre size225/45 R17; 245/40 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationBMW M3
4898 mmLength4433 mm
1775 mmWidth1710 mm
1450 mmHeight1340 mm
1650 KgWeight1560 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Opel Omega and 1995 BMW M3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, BMW M3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…