2000 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 5.7i V8 (310 Hp) 2000Overall Score82.5/100
2000 Opel Omega vs 2000 BMW 3 Serisi Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • BMW
3 Serisi
BMW 3 Serisi 2000Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 23.25 points.
82.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationBMW 3 Serisi
OpelMakeBMW
OmegaModel3 Serisi
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationBMW 3 Serisi
7,0 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
250 km/hTop speed190 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement1895 cc
310 HPPower105 HP
450 NmTorque165 Nm
8Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationBMW 3 Serisi
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank55 lt
18 ltUrban consumption10,8 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
14 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationBMW 3 Serisi
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
235/45 R17Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationBMW 3 Serisi
4898 mmLength4210 mm
1775 mmWidth1700 mm
1450 mmHeight1390 mm
1650 KgWeight1150 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Opel Omega and 2000 BMW 3 Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 23.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…