DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Opel Omega vs 2000 Cadillac Escalade Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

82.5–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeCadillac
OmegaModelEscalade
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

7,0 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
250 km/hTop speed177 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5736 cc
310 HPPower258 HP
450 NmTorque447 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank114 lt
18 ltUrban consumption18,1 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption14,7 lt
14 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
235/45 R17Tyre sizeP265/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4898 mmLength5116 mm
1776 mmWidth1956 mm
1540 mmHeight1905 mm
1690 KgWeight2605 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2985 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Opel Omega and 2000 Cadillac Escalade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…