DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Opel Omega vs 1999 Pontiac Firebird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

82.5–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakePontiac
OmegaModelFirebird
2000Model year1999
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

7,0 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
310 HPPower309 HP
450 NmTorque454 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank59 lt
18 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
14 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
235/45 R17Tyre size235/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4898 mmLength4920 mm
1776 mmWidth1890 mm
1540 mmHeight1340 mm
1690 KgWeight1635 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Opel Omega and 1999 Pontiac Firebird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…