2000 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 5.7 V8 (310 Hp) 2000Overall Score82.5/100
2000 Opel Omega vs 1995 Chevrolet Impala Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Chevrolet
Impala
Chevrolet Impala 5.7i (264 Hp) 1995Overall Score81.5/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
82.5–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationChevrolet Impala
OpelMakeChevrolet
OmegaModelImpala
2000Model year1995
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats6
5Doors4
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationChevrolet Impala
7,0 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed195 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5733 cc
310 HPPower264 HP
450 NmTorque447 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationChevrolet Impala
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank87 lt
18 ltUrban consumption—
10 ltExtra-urban consumption—
14 ltAverage consumption11,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationChevrolet Impala
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears—
235/45 R17Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationChevrolet Impala
4898 mmLength5439 mm
1776 mmWidth1968 mm
1540 mmHeight1415 mm
1690 KgWeight1850 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2945 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Opel Omega and 1995 Chevrolet Impala approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…