DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Opel Omega vs 1990 Opel Kadett Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 17 points.

81.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeOpel
OmegaModelKadett
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

5,4 s0–100 km/h7,7 s
282 km/hTop speed217 km/h
3615 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
377 HPPower156 HP
568 NmTorque203 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank52 lt
16,1 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/45 R17; 265/40 R17Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4770 mmLength3998 mm
1810 mmWidth1666 mm
1435 mmHeight1395 mm
1690 KgWeight990 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Opel Omega and 1990 Opel Kadett approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 17 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

Comments are loading…