2000 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 3.2i V6 (218 Hp) 2000Overall Score68.5/100
2000 Opel Omega vs 2000 Chrysler Intrepid Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Chrysler
Intrepid
Chrysler Intrepid 3.2 i V6 24V (228 Hp) 2000Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationChrysler Intrepid
OpelMakeChrysler
OmegaModelIntrepid
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats4
4Doors5
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationChrysler Intrepid
9,0 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
240 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3175 ccEngine displacement3231 cc
218 HPPower228 HP
290 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationChrysler Intrepid
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank64 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationChrysler Intrepid
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/55 R16Tyre size225/60 R16
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationChrysler Intrepid
4898 mmLength5174 mm
1776 mmWidth1900 mm
1455 mmHeight1420 mm
1710 KgWeight1630 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2870 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Opel Omega and 2000 Chrysler Intrepid approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…