DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Opel Omega vs 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Challenger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeMitsubishi
OmegaModelChallenger
1997Model year1997
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h—
243 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2962 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
211 HPPower185 HP
270 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank74 lt
15,5 ltUrban consumption16 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
225/55 R16Tyre size265/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4785 mmLength4530 mm
1785 mmWidth1775 mm
1450 mmHeight1730 mm
1605 KgWeight1830 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Opel Omega and 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…