DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Opel Omega vs 1994 Plymouth Acclaim Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Plymouth Acclaim

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakePlymouth
OmegaModelAcclaim
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h—
227 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2969 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
177 HPPower143 HP
240 NmTorque232 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size195/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4600 mm
1760 mmWidth1730 mm
1445 mmHeight1360 mm
1410 KgWeight1350 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Opel Omega and 1994 Plymouth Acclaim approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Plymouth Acclaim leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…