1987 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 3.0 3000 V6 CAT (156 Hp) 1987Overall Score64.5/100
1987 Opel Omega vs 1987 Ford Aerostar Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1987 • Ford
Aerostar
Ford Aerostar 3.0i V6 (147 Hp) 1987Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Ford Aerostar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Aerostar
OpelMakeFord
OmegaModelAerostar
1987Model year1987
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Aerostar
9,8 s0–100 km/h—
217 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2969 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
156 HPPower147 HP
230 NmTorque224 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Aerostar
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank79 lt
—Urban consumption16 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Aerostar
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/75 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Aerostar
4740 mmLength4440 mm
1760 mmWidth1820 mm
1445 mmHeight1850 mm
1390 KgWeight1530 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase3020 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1987 Opel Omega and 1987 Ford Aerostar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Aerostar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…