DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Opel Omega vs 1990 Mazda MPV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MPV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda MPV
OpelMakeMazda
OmegaModelMPV
1990Model year1990
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors4

Performance

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda MPV
8,2 s0–100 km/h—
230 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2969 ccEngine displacement2954 cc
200 HPPower154 HP
265 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda MPV
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank74 lt
14,3 ltUrban consumption—
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,7 ltAverage consumption11,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda MPV
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda MPV
4770 mmLength4465 mm
1760 mmWidth1826 mm
1445 mmHeight1694 mm
1490 KgWeight1831 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2805 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Opel Omega and 1990 Mazda MPV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MPV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…