1990 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.6i (150 Hp) 1990Overall Score64.5/100
1990 Opel Omega vs 1990 Ford Aerostar Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Ford
Aerostar
Ford Aerostar 3.0i V6 (147 Hp) 1990Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Ford Aerostar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Aerostar
OpelMakeFord
OmegaModelAerostar
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Aerostar
9,8 s0–100 km/h—
215 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2594 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
150 HPPower147 HP
220 NmTorque224 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Aerostar
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank79 lt
14,1 ltUrban consumption16 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption11 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Aerostar
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/75 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Aerostar
4740 mmLength4440 mm
1760 mmWidth1820 mm
1445 mmHeight1850 mm
1415 KgWeight1530 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase3020 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Opel Omega and 1990 Ford Aerostar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Aerostar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…