DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Opel Omega vs 2000 BMW 5 Serisi Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

65.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeBMW
OmegaModel5 Serisi
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
228 km/hTop speed211 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
170 HPPower143 HP
226 NmTorque280 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
15,3 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4898 mmLength4775 mm
1785 mmWidth1800 mm
1455 mmHeight1435 mm
1530 KgWeight1555 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Opel Omega and 2000 BMW 5 Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…